UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :HB Economic Theory
ISSN :2232-0032
Main Author :Ismail Zuriadah, Dockery Everton, Ahmad Anis Suriati,
Title :Does stock options plan really matter on the Malaysian firm performance? (IR)
Place of Production :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :2017
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Full Text :
This paper examines the effect of stock options plan on firm performance. By using a multivariate regression analysis on 58 Malaysian listed firms with stock option plan, the main finding shows that granting stock option plans do not entirely lead to improvements over firm performance in Malaysia. From this result may spur a debate about the role stock option plans play in enhancing firm performance as in the few years that stock options have been in use in Malaysia, stock option plans gained popularity. But at the same time manipulation in accounting measures such as creative accounting and earnings management, has led the public to question the practicality in adopting stock option plans at least for reducing agency problems.

References
1. Abdelaziz, E.M., Amine, L., & Lanour, C. (2011). Stock options and the performance of CAC40 listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 218-228. 2. Abdul Rahman, R., & Mohamed Ali, F.H. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783–804. 3. Aboody, D. (1996). Market valuation of employee stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 357-391. 4. Aboody, D., & Kasznik, R. (2000). CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 73-100. 5. Anderson, R.C., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance 58(3), 1301-1327. 6. Ariff, M., Shamsher, M., & Nasir, A.M. (1998). Stock pricing in Malaysia: Corporate financial and investment management. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press: Serdang. 7. Bebchuk, L., & Fried, J. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 71-92. 8. Bebchuk, L., & Grinstein, Y. (2005). The growth of executive pay. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 283-303. 9. Beiner, S., Drobetz,W., Schmid, F. & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism? Kyklos, 57, 327–356. 10. Bettis, J.C., Bizjak, J.M., & Lemmon, M.L. (2005). Exercise behaviour, valuation and the incentive effects of employee stock options. Journal of Financial Economics 76(2). 445-470. 11. Bhagat, S., & Black, B.S. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27,231-274. 12. Black, B.S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2002). Does Corporate Governance Affect Firm value? Evidence from Korea (Working Paper No.237). Standford Law School. 13. Blasi, J., Freeman, R., Mackin, C., & Keuse, D. (2010). Creating a bigger pie? The effects of employee ownership, profit sharing and stock options on workplace performance, shared capitalism at work: employee ownership, profit and gain sharing and broad-based stock options. Doughlas Kruse, Richard Freeman and Joseph Blasi (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 14. Brickley, J., Bhagat, S. & Lease, R. (1985). The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 115-129, 15. Brook, C. (2008). Introductory Econometrics for Finance (2nd Edn). Cambridge: UK 16. Brown, S., & Warner, J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3-31. 17. Bulan, L.P., Sanyal, P., & Yan, Z. (2010). A few bad apples: An analysis of CEO performance pay and firm productivity. Journal of Economics and Business, 62, 273-306. 18. Bushman, R. M., & Indjejikian, R. J. (1993). Accounting income, stock price, and managerial compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), 3-23. 19. Carpenter, J.N. (1998). The exercise and valuation of executive stock option. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 127-158. 20. Cheung, Y.L., Rau, P.R. & Stouraitis, A. (2006). Tunnelling, propping and expropriation: evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82,343-386. 21. Chourou, L., Abaoub, E., & Saadi, S. (2008). The economic determinants of CEO stock option compensation. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18(1), 61-77. 22. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L.H.P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112. 23. Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 24. Cohen, R. B., Hall B. J., & Viceira, L. M. (2000), Do Executive Stock Options Encourage Risk- Taking? (Working Paper). Harvard Business School. 25. Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D., & Naveen, L. (2005). Boards: Does one size fit all? (Working paper). Arizona State University. 26. Conyon, M.J., & Leech, D. (1994). Top pay, company performance and Corporate Governance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56 (3), 229-247. 27. Core, J., Holthausen, R., & Larker, D. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406. 28. Core J.E., & Guay, W.R. (2001). Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics, 61 (2). 253-287. 29. Cosh, A., & Hudges, A. (1997). Executive remuneration, executive dismissal and institutional shareholdings. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 469-492. 30. Coughlan, A., & Schmidt, R. (1985). Executive compensation, management turnover and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1-3),43-66. 31. Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., & Sweeney, A.P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1-36. 32. Defond, M.L., & Hung, M. (2004). Investor protection and corporate governance: Evidence from Worldwide CEO Turnover. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 269-312. 33. DeFusco. R., Johnson, R., & Zorn, T. J. (1990). The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 617-627. 34. Ding, D.K., & Sun, Q. (2001), Causes and effect of stock option plans: Evidences from Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9, 563-599. 35. Duffhues, P., Kabir, R., Mertens, G., & Roosenboom, P. (2003). Employee stock option grants and firm performance in the Netherlands. Bedrijsskunde, 75, 667-678. 36. Duffhues P., & Kabir, R. (2008). Is the pay-performance relationship always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 1, 45-60. 37. Fich, E., & Shivdasani, A. J. (2005). The impact of stock-option compensation for outside directors on firm value. Journal of Business, 78 (6), 2229-2254. 38. Gaver, J., & Gaver, K. (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and economics, 16, 125–160. 39. Gerety, M., Hoi, C. K., & Robin, A. (2001). Do shareholders benefit from the adoption of incentive pay for directors? Financial Management, 30, 45–61. 40. Gibson, M.S. (2003). Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging market? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 231-250. 41. Hafiza Aishah, H. & Susela D. (2009). Board characteristics, ownership structure and earnings quality: Malaysian evidence. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 8, 97 – 123. 42. Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. The Academy of Management Journal, 36 (4), 844-863. 43. Hanlon, M., Rajgopal, S., & Shevlin, T.J. (2003). Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (1-3), 3-43. 44. Haniffa, R.M., & Cooke, T.E. (2002). Culture corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38,317-349. 45. Haniffa, R.M., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33 (7-8), 1034-1062. 46. Harrel, F.E. (2001). Regression Model Strategies: With Application to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis. USA: Springer. 47. Hassan, H., & Hoshino, Y. (2007). The performance impacts of stock options in Japan. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 20, 27-41. 48. Hillegeist, S. A., & Penalva, F. (2004). Stock Option incentives and firm performance (Working Paper No 535). IESE Business School, University of Navarra. 49. Hochberg, Y., & Linsey, L. (2010). Incentive, targeting and firm performance: An Analysis of Non-executive stock options: An Analysis of non-executive stock options. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 4148-4186. 50. How, J., Jelic, R., Saadouni, B., & Verhoeven, P. (2007). Share allocations and performance of KLSE second board IPOs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 15(3), 292-314. 51. Hutchinson, M. (2003). An analysis of the association between firm risk, executive share options and accounting performance: some Australian evidence. Review of Accounting and Finance, 2 (3), 48 – 71. 52. Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. 53. Kahle, K. M., & Shastri, K. (2005). Firm performance, capital structure, and the tax benefits of employee stock options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 135-160. 54. Kang, J. K., & Shivdani, A. (1996). Does the Japanese governance system enhance shareholder wealth? Evidence from the stock price effects of top management turnover. The Review of Financial Studies, 9, 1061-1095. 55. Kang, J.K. (2002). Handbook on company secretarial practice in Malaysia (3rd Edition). Kuala Lumpur: Lexis Nexis Business Solutions. 56. Kaplan, S.N. (1994). Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 102 (3), 510-546. 57. Kaplan S.N. & Minton, B.A. (2008). How has CEO turnover changed? Increasingly performance sensitive boards and increasingly uneasy CEOs (NBER Working Papers 12465). National Bureau of Economic Research. 58. Kato, H.K., Lemmon, M., Luo, M., & Schallheim, J. (2005). An empirical examination of the costs and benefits of executive stock options: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 435-461. 59. Kedia S., & Mozumdar, A. (2002). Performance impact of employee stock options retrieval in http://ssrn.com/abstract=384188. AFA 2003 Washington D.C. Meetings 60. Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 ( 3 ), 375–400. 61. Kim, N. J. (1990). Do long-term incentive plans matter? Business Forum, 15(2), 15. 62. Kole, S. (1997). The complexity of compensation contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(1). 79-104. 63. Lambert, R., Larcker, D., & Verrecchia, R. (1991). Portfolio considerations in valuing executive compensation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 129-149. 64. Landsman, W., Lang, M., & Yeh, S. (2007). Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Non-executive Employees. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 22 (2), 109-138. 65. Langmann, C. (2007). Stock Market Reaction and Stock Option Plans: Evidence from Germany. SBR (59), 85-106. 66. La Porta, R., De-Silanes, F.I., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance LIV (2), 471-517. 67. Larker, D.F. (1983). The association between performance plan adoption and corporate capital investment. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 3-30. 68. Lausten, M. (2002). CEO turnover, firm performance and corporate governance: Empirical evidence on Danish firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 319-414. 69. Lehman, E.L. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based On Ranks. Holden-Day: San Francisco. 70. Leonhardt, D. (April 19, 2000). Technology share downturn diminishing stock options. The New York Times, p.C1. 71. Lie, E. (2005). On the Timing of CEO Stock Option Awards. Management Science 51 (5), 802-812. 72. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J.W. (1992).A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48, 59–77. 73. Ittner, C.D., Lambert, R.A., & Larcker, D. F. (2003). The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 89–127. 74. Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 163-184. 75. Morck, R., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1989). Alternative mechanisms for corporate control. The American Economic Review, 79 (4), 842-52. 76. Moscu, R.G. (2013). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 156-166. 77. Nagaoka, S. (2005). Determinants of the introduction of stock options by Japanese firms: Analysis from the incentive and selection perspectives. Journal of Business, 78 (6), 2289-2315. 78. Obiyathulla, I. B., Sharifah Raihan S, M. Z., Mohd Eskandar S.M.R. & Azhar M. 2009. Granting employee stock options (ESOs), market reaction and firm performance. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance,5 (1), 117–138. 79. Oyer, P. (2004). Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects? The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1619-1649. 80. Ozkan, N. (2009). CEO compensation and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK panel data. European Financial Management, 17,260-285 81. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. McGraw-Hill International: NSW, Australia. 82. Pandher, G.S. (2003). Valuation of stock option grants under multiple severance risks. Journal of Derivatives 11(2).25-37. 83. Rajgopal, S., & Shevlin, T. (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 145-171. 84. Renneboog, L. (2000). Ownership, managerial control and the governance of companies listed on the Brussels stock exchange. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1959–1995 85. Rubinstein, M. (1995). On the accounting valuation of employee stock options. Journal of Derivatives, 3(1), 8-24. 86. Salsiah, M.A., Norman, M.S., & Mohamat, S.H. (2008). Ownership structure and earnings management in Malaysian listed companies: the size effect. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting 1(2), 89-116 87. Samsa, M.K. & Scheidt, K.S. (2003). International Employee Equity Plans: Participation beyond Border. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 88. Sanders, W. G. (2001). Behavioral responses of CEO's to stock ownership and stock option pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 477-492. 89. Sanders, W.M. G., & Hambrick. D.C. (2007). Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 50, 1055-1078. 90. Sharma, K. (2006). Understanding employee stock options. Global Business Revie, 7 (1), 77-93. 91. Sesil, J.C., Kroumova, M.K., Blasi, J.R., & Kruse, D. L. (2002). Broad-based employee stock options in U.S. New economy firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(2). 273-294. 92. Smith, G.S., & Swan, P.L. (2008). The road to riches: CEO incentives and firm performance. Retrieved at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1089968 93. Triki, T., & Ureche-Rangau, L. (2012). Stock options and firm performance: New evidence from the French Market. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 23 (2), 154–185. 94. Wan Hussain W.N. (2009). The impact of family-firm structure and board composition on corporate transparency: evidence based on segment disclosures in Malaysia. The International Journal of Accountin, 44 (4), 313-333. 95. Yeo, G. H. H., Chen, S. S., Ho, K. W., & Lee, C. (1999). Effects of executive share option plans on shareholder wealth and firm performance: The Singapore evidence. Financial Review, 34(2), 1-20. 96. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 185-213. 97. Zahiruddin, G. & Fauziah, M.T. (2012). Effective interest alignment mechanism or tool to expropriate: A review of Malaysian ESOS Adoption, Malaysian Management Journal 16, 59-74.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)